- I make 10 million HUF a year being a full-time self-employed person in Hungary.
- I pay 0.6 million KATA tax (12 x 50000) for the first 6 million, netting 5.4 million from that lot.
- I pay 1.6 million (0.4 x 4 million) for the remaining 4 million, netting 2.4 million from that.
-> In the end, from the 10 million HUF I'll get 7.8 million after taxes and social contributions.
Yes.
However, is that 10,000,000 HUF revenue or income (i.e. profit after expenses)? It matters under KATA. For example, under KATA if you make only 500,000 HUF a year income after considering your expenses, you still have to pay 600,000 that year in taxes. You just paid 100,000 HUF more to the state than you actually put in your pocket. That is, KATA does not care if you make a profit or not. You have to pay the state your fixed rate month after month.
But, if you decide to be taxed as a normal self employed person, you only pay taxes on your actual after expense income at 10%. Which can make your overall tax considerably lower if your actual profits that year are low. Of you can elect to pay a flat 37% tax rate option on profits only by selecting a simplified entrepreneurial tax (EVA). Even if 37% seems high, your tax liability may be less than if you used KATA if your profits were less.
KATA is a good option only if you start the ground running with a good, steady reliable income (which is virtually unheard of for the self employed) and you hate paperwork. Else it may be better to start a KFT company, pay yourself a medium salary, and take the rest as a dividend. So, for example, you make a profit of 10 Million HUF as a KFT:
- You paid yourself a salary of 100,000 a month, and pay income and social taxes to the state of about 50,000 HUF a month which you took as an expense of the KFT (expense are not considered with KATA).
- The company pays a 16% company tax on the 10,000,000 profit only of = 1,600,000 HUF
- You pay the remainder of 8,400,000 HUF out as a dividend and pay 16% dividend taxes on that netting yourself about 7,000,000.
- Adding your salary plus your post tax dividend you get: 7,000,000+1,200,000=8,200,000
So you made 400,000 HUF more as a KFT than if you used KATA. Well, maybe. You might, or might not, also need to pay tax social taxes on the dividend. So in short, you need to really talk to an accountant to make sure what tax system option actually puts more money in your pocket. But that also assumes you pay out all that years profit to yourself. You can also leave that money in the company and use it next year for company needs. So money there is actually more money in the company's pocket with a KFT. And since you would have to pay those expenses yourself as simple self employed, you are actually fiscally better off business wise having a KFT.